Materials Produced By the VGI Working Group
Materials Produced By the VGI Working Group
Final Report
- Final Report of the California Joint Agencies Vehicle-Grid Integration Working Group
- Final Report Annexes
Methodology Development
- VGI Working Group Stage 2 Report
- Updated V2 IOU Joint Proposal on Use-Case Assessment Methodology
- IOU Perspective on VGI Use-case Benefits and Costs
- Workshop 9/26 Methodology Issues Brainstorming Notes
Use Case Development, Submissions, Screening, and Scoring
The Use Case Assessment Database is an on-line viewable Airtable containing the use case screening and scoring compilations and summaries from which all use case assessment information in this report was derived. This database has the following tables, which are linked here as Excel files:
- LDV use case scoring
- MHDV use case scoring
- Scoring comments
- Screening results
- Use case submissions
- Use case master list
In addition to the database, the following documents and spreadsheets were produced by the Working Group:
Details on submission, screening and scoring process and results:
Templates for submissions:
- Subgroup B use case submission template
- Subgroup B screening template
- Subgroup B LDV scoring template
- Subgroup B MHDV scoring template
Final results of submissions:
Screening results and use-case-specific comments on screening:
- Pile A consensus pass final screening results (12/8)
- Pile B fail final screening results (12/8)
- Pile C disputed pass final screening results (12/8)
Screening overview comments and rules:
- Team 3 screening comments/rules (10/31)
- Team 6 screening comments/rules (11/04)
- Team 8 screening comments/rules (11/04)
- Team 9 screening comments/rules (10/31)
- Team 10 screening comments/rules (11/04)
- PG&E-SCE-Enel X screening comments/rules (11/12 revised)
- Consensus assumptions from 1/22-1/23 workshop
Scoring results and use-case specific comments on scoring:
- LDV scoring compilation and summary (revised 1/13)
- MHDV scoring compilation and summary (12/26)
- LDV and MHDV scoring comments (12/26)
Ranking or analyzing the use cases:
- Honda Value Metric, Inputs to CPUC VGI Working Group Question #1 (1/20/20)
- Nissan VGI Scoring Data Perspectives
- Karim Farhat scoring analysis / Prime subsets
- SCE Interactive Scoring Display Tool
Other:
- Development of Market Analysis and Use-Cases for Medium & Heavy-Duty Vehicle-Grid Integration Meredith Alexander et al, CALSTART and UCS
- Ratepayer Impact Benefits Category Ed Burgess, Vehicle-Grid Integration Council
- Use Case Scoring Results – LDV VGIC Workshop #4 Presentation
- E3 California Framework for Grid Value of VGI, 4/12/2019
- Fermata use cases providing value
Policy Recommendations and Survey
The Policy Recommendations Database is an on-line viewable Airtable containing the following information. Each of the tables in this database is also available as an Excel file via the links below.
- Policy recommendations
- Policy survey responses
- Policy survey results
- Policy survey comments
- Added comments on policies
- Policy survey respondents
- Policy strategy tags
- Policy short versions
Supplementary Materials on Policy Submitted by Participants
Note: all policy recommendation materials submitted by participants were incorporated into the Policy Recommendations Database linked above. In addition, some participants submitted supplementary PDF documents related to policy recommendations:
- CalETC supplementary document on policy recommendations
- Energy innovation supplementary document on policy recommendations
- Amzur supplementary document on policy recommendations
- Fermata supplementary document on policy recommendations
- The Mobility House supplementary document on policy recommendations
- ENGIE Impact policy survey analysis
Working Group Participant Submissions on Comparison of VGI Use Cases with Other DER Use Cases
Note: these submissions are neither endorsed nor reviewed by the Working Group
- CEC response on importance and benefits of VGI
- SBUA Response on importance of VGI
- VGIC response on importance of VGI
- CESA’s informal comments on the VGI-DER value comparison questions
- VGIC PUC Question C Big Picture Response
- ENGIE Impact and DER Comparisons Team, Addressing PUC Question C
- E3 Vehicle Grid Integration Analysis: Presentation to VGI Working Group
- Columbia University SIPA Vehicle Grid Integration in California: A Cost-Benefit Comparison Study
- Sumitomo Comparison of VGI with DERs
“Stock-Takes” of Existing Efforts
Note: these were submitted by CPUC, CAIO, CEC, and Peninsula Clean Energy on behalf of CCAs, responding to a solicitation of “stock taking” of existing efforts
